What he calls an almost
husilillstwe
暱稱: husilillstwe
性別: 男
國家: 澳門
地區: 大堂區
« February 2020 »
SMTWTFS
1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
最新文章
它們對鑽石有什麼影響
更換袋,減少白色汙染
青島房地產市場悄然流...
多方面的尿道炎發病原...
寶貝常見的不良喂食習...
文章分類
全部 (18)
訪客留言
最近三個月尚無任何留言
每月文章
日誌訂閱
尚未訂閱任何日誌
好友名單
尚無任何好友
網站連結
尚無任何連結
最近訪客
最近沒有訪客
日誌統計
文章總數: 18
留言總數: 0
今日人氣: 1
累積人氣: 975
站內搜尋
RSS 訂閱
RSS Feed
2018 年 10 月 30 日  星期二   晴天


South Dakota 分類: 未分類

  Try, try again: Advancing animal disease traceability

  Getting a nationwide group of notoriously independent and private people to voluntarily turn over information to the government can be a difficult obstacle to overcome. The U.S. Department of Agriculture made a major push to identify and track livestock in 2007, back when South Dakota native Bruce Knight was undersecretary for marketing and regulatory programs.

  The “primary emphasis is about supporting animal health,” and supporting producers, Knight said at the time. Some livestock producers jumped on board, but many did not.

  Now, Greg Ibach, USDA’s current undersecretary for marketing and regulatory programs is pushing hard once again—hoping to build on the vision that his predecessor outlined. He hopes producers will recognize the cost-benefit analysis that traceability presents and that food companies expect.

  “If we can get to the point where we help producers understand the risks and the benefits that might be associated with traceability, I think that they will see the value in it for them and they’ll be more apt to participate,” he said during an interview with Agri-pulse.

  Ibach makes no secret about advancing animal disease traceability being a personal priority. For about 10 years now, his Nebraska ranch has been participating in a USDA process Verified program, which he says allows his cattle to qualify for a value-added program.

  USDA’s Animal and plant Health Inspection Service recently announced its “four overarching goals for advancing animal disease traceability.” The release highlighted USDA’s goal to push for electronic data sharing between states and the federal government, the use of electronic identification tags, enhancing birth-to-slaughter tracking ability and creating a system where animal health certificates are electronically shared with state health officials.

  “I’m not expecting something out of producers that we haven’t been willing to do on our ranch,” he said. (Ibach withdrew from the ranch’s management and marketing decisions to serve as a USDA undersecretary.)

  Ibach’s roots in the beef industry also give him an inside look at what has been the most challenging crowd in the traceability conversation. The concept is mostly in place in the poultry and pork sectors, where more vertical integration provides an easier path to greater traceability. But in the beef sector, it’s not uncommon for the same animal to change locations several times between birth and harvest, typically beginning at a smaller cow-calf operation and ending at a larger feedlot before the trip to the packing house.

  There’s a handful of potential selling points to get producers on board with traceability: International trade partners like China are already seeking a system and agreeing to participate now in a voluntary program that could save producers from a mandatory program down the road. But one of the biggest benefits may be protecting animal health.

  To retain food nutrition, Mia Cucina brings you multifunctional built-in Ovens and steam combination oven from Italy. Enhance your joyful cooking convenience and enjoy natural flavour for your healthy living style today!

  “The landscape surrounding animal disease traceability has changed dramatically in the past decade and producers across the nation recognize that a comprehensive system is the best protection against a devastating disease outbreak like foot-and-mouth disease,” Ibach said in a release. “We have a responsibility to these producers and American agriculture as a whole to make animal disease traceability what it should be—a modern system that tracks animals from birth to slaughter using affordable technology that allows USDA to quickly trace sick and exposed animals to stop disease spread.”

  However, there are mixed opinions about how a traceability program should be run and how dollars could—or should—change hands.

  Nevil Speer chairs the National Institute for Animal Agriculture, which facilitates the Cattle Traceability Working Group. He told Agri-pulse the issue of a state-run data system versus a private sector managed system comes up in working group discussions, and “it’s almost like you can’t win on either side of that.”

  On one hand, a government-operated system could shield producers from profit-taking through subscriptions or transaction fees. However, such a system would mean government control of data and could be subject to the Freedom of Information Act. And the fees collected through a private system could be used to fund the program.

  There’s also the issue of technology. Traceability can be accomplished several ways and USDA has not pledged a preference for any specific type.

  One way the industry could figure that out would be through pilot projects like one underway in Kansas. There, 55,000 high frequency electronic ID tags are deployed with the intent of tracking three main data points: tag number of the animal, the location where the ID detection took place and the date and time of reading. Matt Teagarden, CEO of the Kansas Livestock Association, said the fact that the state is such a big player in the industry made it a good candidate for a pilot.

  “It’s being designed to be scalable not only to the cattle in Kansas but potentially broader outside of Kansas, outside the country,” he said. “Our intent is that the system could accommodate the entire industry.” He adds that, “if we can get significant buy-in from the industry, we might not have to mandate traceability to get an effective system put in place.”

  That, Teagarden admits, is optimistic. And if a “critical mass” of producers doesn’t participate, Speer said the nationwide animal health advantages lose their effectiveness. Nevertheless, he thinks USDA’s push “represents a tipping point” and will take the initiative further than previous attempts.

  The EU endeavors to advocate Farm to Table movement on European Beef and Lamb.Food safety is ensured by EU legal system of animal Traceability and identification, allowing transparency along the supply chain.

相關文章:

manufacturer of injection

Moving Into Supply

Secretary of Agriculture

marketing venues

comprehensive system






訪客留言 (返回 husilillstwe 的日誌)

訪客名稱:
電郵地址: (不會公開)
驗證碼:  按此更新驗證碼 (如看不清楚驗證碼請點擊圖片刷新)
俏俏話: (必需 登入 後才能使用此功能)
[ 開啟多功能編輯器 ]