問：
1. Try to find out a piece of good photojournalism. Comment both of its picture and text quality.
2. Try to find out a piece of photojournalism which may violate code of ethics. Explain why?
答：
1.
From this picture, we can see some elders of Hong Kong shined shoes for some White collars in Central. Why I select this picture as a piece of good photo-journalism? It is because this picture can clearly bring us a message of how hard our Hong Kong people worked in our previous Hong Kong. Furthermore, we can clearly notice the wealth gap between the rich and the poor in Hong Kong. Moreover, Hong Kong people are fighting for their lives every day. This kind of fighting spirit is very good for us to follow and learn.
2.
2010-10-08
英國的三名女警看黃色影片後寂寞難耐，就強迫一名囚犯數次吃大量偉哥並連續與她們發生性關係，最終導致男囚犯暴死。女審訊員們對付不開口的男囚犯自 有一套辦法：挑逗性地撫摸，只穿著超短裙和內衣審訊，甚至使用偽造的月經血塗抹在囚犯臉上……數名全裸的伊拉克男性囚犯被命令背朝鏡頭蹲下，四肢交錯，模 擬集體性交的場景。英國《每日鏡報》刊登多幅英軍虐待犯人的照片
 
有關新聞詳情：http://big5.china.com/gate/big5/ghujf.blog.china.com/201010/7030073.html
我認為上述之組圖均違反了道規範。
一. 這報導可能是真實的，但也並非一定是準確和全面的。
二. 即是那些是犯了罪的囚犯，但他們終究與監獄看管人員一樣，都是人頖。強迫囚犯們去做一些他們不想做的事，已屬沒有尊重他們的意願；更甚的，把這些過程拍下一張又一張的照片，然後刊登於網上及報章上；這些均沒有尊重他人，囚犯們也是有尊嚴的。
三. 右上方圖的，並沒有尊重已逝世的囚犯。圖中的女士面帶笑容，感覺她好像是玩弄他人及沒有尊重死者。
|
