星期六…工作效率根本係零, 所以我係絕對支持5天工作天!! 放2日假先可以差電ga…今日都係執下d畫….吹下水…收了一個sms: “我已100%正式分了手” 雖然好突然, 但係好事!!
“大金冷氣”的鈴聲令我控制不了自已, 因為呢首鈴聲實在太好笑啦…結果呢個weekend 我不斷的”art chi na no, art chi na no” 媽咪同細妹都話我好煩…haha…因為隻公仔太似高諾治啦……….haha
met you in mtr station, I think that u saw me as well…u walked forward and I walked backward…that’s what we can do for each other….right?
多謝Billie 的邀請, 令我有一個好relaxing 的weekend, 先去ymt 睇 Hidden, 這是第一部我看過的電影節作品, 突然間覺得自已好有文化氣息, 雖然唔係好明佢講乜…但令人思考的電影會令不同的人有不同的看法….自殺的一莫, 真的全場嚇呆了……..
再去Knoutsford Happy Hour…我想我的最愛將會是Pina Colada…hehe, 談了很多東西, 愛情, 激情, 公司, 小人, rotaract….不知不覺就傾左2個幾鐘…
去Italian Tomato 食飯, 途經Giodano, 就咁就買左一樣的褲, 我就買多件衫, 很開心呢!!
我送Billie去Jordan, 佢送我去MTR station… what a relaxing day! Thank you Billie!
what the movie said?
As Mr. Haneke explains in the interview on the DVD, the film is about living with guilt. Georges' reaction to the tapes, his nightmares, and his outbursts to Majid and his son clearly demonstrate his guilt for his actions as a six-year-old. To enforce this theme, Haneke layers on marital guilt, national guilt (Algeria) and international guilt (Iraq). Therefore, the identity of the sender of the tapes is irrelevant to the theme of the movie. Nonetheless, the film gives us tantalizing clues forcing us to consider the possibilities. According to Haneke’s interview, the truth is always hidden. But that doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. To dismiss this film as allegory or Bunuelian surrealism is the easy way out. The real challenge is to find a truth that is consistent with the internal reality of the movie. Here’s what I found. The scene in the restroom between George and Majid’s son shows the son is rather pleased with Georges' guilt-ridden state of mind. The son is very aware of the history between Majid and George (and could have drawn the pictures) and he blames Georges for ruining his father’s life. He seems to have plenty of motivation for revenge. It’s interesting that Majid’s suicide is precipitated by his arrest which is precipitated by Pierrot’s disappearance which is precipitated by – what? When he returns, Pierrot seems to have learned about his mother and Pierre. Who told him? Were they seen together? Pierre and Anne are not very discrete about their relationship as we see in the Café scene. Perhaps Majid’s son witnessed something and told Pierrot, thus starting the events that trigger his father’s suicide. But that would mean Majid’s son and Pierrot know each other. Sure enough, there they are in the last scene. That short, unheard conversation speaking volumes. Watch Majid’s son glance around to make sure they aren’t being observed. Watch his hands go palms up, imploring Pierrot to believe what he has to say. Notice that Pierrot doesn’t react negatively to Majid’s son but simply returns to his friends. And notice that the credits roll only when both characters have left the scene. This conversation is the last piece of the story and shouldn’t be overlooked. Finally, this school steps scene appears to be another videotape. So does that scene a few minutes earlier of Georges parking his car before going to bed. That scene almost exactly matches the composition of the first scene which we know is a tape. The camera is back a little further but it’s still near the wall. Someone is still making videotapes and it can’t be Majid. It’s Majid’s son. He has acted either alone or with his father's knowledge to torment Georges. But Haneke keeps this hidden because this movie isn’t about either Majid or his son. It’s about Georges' guilt - and ours.
|
