「伽利略•蔡」無聊論

2013 年 7 月 10 日  星期三


Things against the Logic 分類: 未分類

RANDOM or HAPHAZARD

I would take random because haphazard would be much more complicated to explain...

Things derived from Random, for instances:

└Emotion (Feeling)

└Rythm (Music)

 

I believe, random(haphazard) is just a product under a generating logic.

for example, in computer, a random number is a formula created with multilple factors, e.g. time, or any other thing, even a cpu name...

in case you want to ask how a random numbe in computer is created? i would suggest the above... however, the random in the world...

 

after i watched this video, i got more confidence, a random without the generating logic, could not be exist...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvJAgrUBF4w

do they look like... a cell?




2013 年 6 月 26 日  星期三


信念 分類: 未分類

到底,人從自己一直的信念中抽離出來的話,會有甚麼後果呢...?

人,在失去了信念的時候,的確就像是浮游在虛無的世界...

有誰能長期承受這種,猶如雙腳不能著地的感覺呢?

意志,甚麼是意志?能堅持的人,就是有意志了嗎?

那麼... 甚麼叫作能夠堅持呢....?




2013 年 6 月 20 日  星期四


鋼之鍊金術師 分類: 未分類

等價交換

兄弟之情

七種原罪

尋找真理

人類與神

(待續)




2013 年 6 月 18 日  星期二


Refactoring 分類: 未分類

LCM (Lowest Common Mulitple), HCF (Highest Common Factor) are the only memory of my primary school.

because those are the things I used everydays in my life...

observing the common factors of different objects, extract it, you would find a new raw-er object.

so, human would have periodic table, would have H2O, this is an important mindset to understand the world...
(however, atoms are just "a smallest" thing observable in a finite era)

anyway, despite of physicial observables, we can go pathological, psychological, philosophical, scientifical, xxx-ical...

 

and then, if you like, we could combine those factors... to "refactor" or so called "create"




2013 年 6 月 5 日  星期三


雪中得炭 vs 溫飽無憂 分類: 未分類

究竟...

哪種快樂較為快樂呢...?




2013 年 6 月 1 日  星期六


Super Logics (III) -Treasure 分類: 未分類

What's it, what's the purpose of it exist

(to be con't)




2013 年 4 月 4 日  星期四


Super Logics (II) - Logic 分類: 未分類

What's it, what's the purpose of it exist

(to be con't)




2013 年 4 月 3 日  星期三


Super Logics (I) - Let's think in "its" point of view 分類: 未分類

I am a theist, i believe there is someone who created the world, who created the me.

Every single elements in this world, were ALL its creations!

I don't believe in random, because there is logically impossible to create a real random.
(Maybe you will say random is random, of course it can't be created. So, please allow me to ask where  do random came from? Fine, I just assume random is just a creation by it)

I believe there must be someone who decided whether egg first or chick first.

I believe it created all the fine details of the world, for example:
physical, like the four elements;
conceptual, like dimensions, temperature, time;
theoretical, like the truths;
mental, like an emotion, a thought, a religion;
logical, like an algorithim, algebra... etc.

Every single elements, there is a purpose of exist, subject to different parties, has their own value in respect of participants' view.

You must have learnt darkness, so in the meanwhile you knew what's lightness;
Death, so you treasure your life;
You learnt logics, so you could undrstand the world, a little bit more;

Lightness, Death, Truth, Earth, Happiness, History, Algebra, Instance, Religion, Temperature, Sun and even Love... has its own existence neccessity for you, for him, for her, for me... and even, for it...

Every single elements, there must be positivity, in the meanwhile, negativity in everythings.

Sun provides light, but it burns;
Knowledge makes you realize and smart, but it makes you lose your emotions;
Money provides happiness, but it needs your sacrifice (your happiness, too);
Your eyes bring you beautiful scenes, but don't forget those uglies;
Speak so you can communicate, but you think lesser;
Think more makes you enjoy more ideas, but it brings you lesser friends, tough;
Marriage brings you sweetness and generation, but you might have to forfeit the goal you wanted to go...

On account of all those neutral natures, balanced attributes, mutual complentaries...
Its main purpose is very obvious~ in order to counterbalance, to create a cyclic.

Philosophically, if you are able to pull your view as wide as it, this scene would be a real typical, purely, detailedly considered, deployed beautifully, above the state of arts, no doubt, a perfect autonomous system if you agree~

 

(Next Episode:
"What's the purpose of 'logics'?"

If you are the creator, what's your purpose to create... 'logic'???)




2013 年 2 月 10 日  星期日


浪費時間? 分類: 未分類

究竟何為浪費時間...?

(待續)




2013 年 1 月 22 日  星期二


知識與智慧,會直接減少了情感... 分類: 未分類

喜怒哀樂,都是來自無知...

言則,當你完全知道了,理解了之後...

人,便會失去了所有的情感...

 

發現人會在於甚麼都不知道的時候,是會因為這樣而開心,是會因為這樣而嬲怒,是會因為這樣而傷心,是會因為這樣而快慰...

 

凡事,皆有因,才有果...

人類饑荒、殺人放火、天災連年、世界大戰、貧富懸殊、弱肉強食、世界末日、地產霸權,

又或者新婚愉快、國運亨通、生活美滿、劫富濟貧、天降甘露、雪中送炭、等等等等...

 

當你知道明白了它的前因後果之後...

你便會明白,這只是一個世界系統裡的其中一小節循環...

 

那人殺人,只是因為那人的一生之中經歷了悲劇;

那人很好人,只是因為那人的一生皆遇著好事情;

 

這國家的滅亡,是因為這個國家,是時候須要滅亡了...

 

當你看透一切,你會失去了感覺...

 

當你不想失去這些感覺...

唯一可做的,向知識 / 智慧 說不...



« | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | »